Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 63 days older than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Celeron B820 - 215 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |