Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $59.0 vs $85.13
- Up to 28% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-10105F - $0.39 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-3450 - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13432 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
72%
Price, $
$85.13
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |