Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1485 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 62% better in League of Legends than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 232 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $78.02 vs $897.22
- Up to 86% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.55 vs $3.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 140 vs 280 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.87/FPS
14%
Price, $
$897.22
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4772 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
143
61%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4772 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |