Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3319 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Phenom II X4 830 - 171 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 24 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Deneb | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |