Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 3152 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Phenom II X4 830 - 104 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
104
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Deneb | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |