Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8320 is 188 days older than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 43% cheaper than FX-8320 - $100.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8320 - $0.6 vs $1.04 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |