Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2150 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $78.02 vs $109.99
- Up to 23% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.71 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than FX-8120 - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
77%
Price, $
$109.99
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Zambezi | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |