Buy on Amazon
$39.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 12 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - $39.99 vs $89.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-2700K - $0.31 vs $0.64 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 9% better in War Thunder than FX-8120 - 140 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
CHUANGWEI AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 125W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10212 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72700K
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 15.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
