Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2381 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $39.99 vs $99.97
- Up to 59% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.34 vs $0.83 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 4% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-8120 - 121 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2679 minutes ago
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |