Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 3117 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $39.99 vs $94.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.08 vs $0.18 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Tanks than FX-8120 - 536 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9856 minutes ago
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9857 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |