Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $39.99 vs $98.15
- Up to 58% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.28 vs $0.66 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than FX-8120 - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9935 minutes ago
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9936 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |