Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1148 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 76% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-6350 - 88 vs 50 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than FX-6350 - $78.02 vs $100.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-6350 - $0.89 vs $2.0 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8113 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |