Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 2479 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 18% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4300 - 183 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 95 vs 120 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15277 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
EPYC | Collection | FX |
Rome | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |