Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 946 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than EPYC 7282 - 132 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 60 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16493 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 60 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |