Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 106 days newer than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-9100F - 295 vs 293 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
293
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$57.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $57.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |