Buy on Amazon
$68.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 491 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G4900 - 129 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 54 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
120
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
