Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 3620 days newer than Core i5-750.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 87% better in Diablo IV than Core i5-750 - 170 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 95 vs 120 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Lynnfield |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
