Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 1843 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 3% better in Saints Row than Core i3-4160T - 159 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
