Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i7-4710HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 1954 days newer than Core i7-4710HQ.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4710HQ - 182 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4710HQ - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 47 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-4710HQ
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 47 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
