Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i5-5350U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 1620 days newer than Core i5-5350U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than Core i5-5350U - 759 vs 723 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5350U - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5350U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 15 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-5350U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-5350U |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
