Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 946 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 28% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G3930T - 226 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
