Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 2894 days newer than Pentium G630.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than Pentium G630 - 172 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Pentium G630
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| EPYC | Collection | Pentium |
| Rome | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
