Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1585 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £49.99 vs £163.79
- Up to 69% better value when playing Control than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £0.25 vs £0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-6350 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
30%
Price, £
£163.79
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |