Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1293 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £163.75 vs £169.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 186 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £0.91 vs £0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
171
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.96/FPS
94%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19466 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
186
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.91/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.99
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |