Buy on Amazon
£108.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 495 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 187 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Core i5-9400F 2.9GHz LGA1151 9M Cache BOX CPU
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74650 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
84.76052249637155%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
