Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 495 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 76 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £128.88 vs £163.75
- Up to 25% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £1.7 vs £2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19370 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
76
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.7/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19370 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |