Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100 is 2321 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 31% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 695 vs 529 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £136.97 vs £163.75
- Up to 35% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £0.2 vs £0.31 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
529
76%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
64%
Price, £
£163.75
83%
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 277 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
695
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£136.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £136.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-14100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |