Buy on Amazon
£163.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 761 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - £163.75 vs £188.88
- Up to 2% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-6700K - £1.07 vs £1.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 13% better in League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 173 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
153
88%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Processor - (8 Core/16 Threads) - YD190XA8AEWOF
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Intel Core I7-6700K Processor (4 GHz, 8 M Cache, LGA1151)
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 38.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
