Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1293 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - £163.75 vs £179.9
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 177 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £1.02 vs £1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
157
88%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
98%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19155 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
177
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.02/FPS
100%
Price, £
£179.9
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £179.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |