Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1258 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 33% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-8400 - 475 vs 357 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-8400 - £0.37 vs £0.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - £146.66 vs £177.39
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
475
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£177.39
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £177.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10846 minutes ago
Buy for £146.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10847 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |