Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - £163.77 vs £217.09
- Up to 21% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700F - £1.04 vs £1.31 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 166 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
157
94%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.31/FPS
79%
Price, £
£217.09
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for £217.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |