Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £218.88 vs £280.13
- Up to 16% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-13600K - £0.85 vs £1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-10700F - 278 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
259
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16766 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
278
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
84%
Price, £
£280.13
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for £280.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16766 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |