Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100 is 1348 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10600K - 152 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - £135.97 vs £158.88
- Up to 24% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10600K - £0.89 vs £1.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
152
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£135.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £135.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Buy for £158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |