Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-13100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-13100F - 211 vs 207 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-14100 - £95.97 vs £138.31
- Up to 30% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-14100 - £0.46 vs £0.66 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £138.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6336 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£95.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £95.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |