Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1286 days older than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - £128.88 vs £138.88
- Up to 10% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-6600K - £0.18 vs £0.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than Core i5-9400F - 709 vs 703 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
703
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13201 minutes ago
Buy for £138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |