Buy on Amazon
£163.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 792 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in League of Legends than Core i7-6700 - 153 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £128.88 vs £163.75
- Up to 20% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £0.86 vs £1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
153
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
80%
Price, £
£163.75
78%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Processor - (8 Core/16 Threads) - YD190XA8AEWOF
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16273 minutes ago
Core i7-6700
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
150
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7 Quad-Core i7-6700 3.4GHz Processor CPU
Buy for £128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i7-6700
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
