Buy on Amazon
£77.03
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1293 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 132 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Core i3-10105F 10th Generation - Desktop processor (3.7 GHz Tuboboost: 4.4 GHz, 4 cores, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for £77.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
80.33012379642366%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
