Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than FX-4350 - 276 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - £59.97 vs £69.82
- Up to 4% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10105F - £0.24 vs £0.25 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
276
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
96%
Price, £
£69.82
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for £69.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |