Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G3930 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - £39.99 vs £69.38
- Up to 43% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-10105F - £0.21 vs £0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
190
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
56%
Price, £
£69.38
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for £69.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 620 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
189
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 620 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |