Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 55% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6405 - £29.99 vs £66.5
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Pentium Gold G6405 - £0.2 vs £0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 51 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G3930 - 151 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
147
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
151
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.44/FPS
45%
Price, £
£66.5
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for £66.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |