Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - £49.99 vs £64.99
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G3930 - 222 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74395 minutes ago
Buy for £64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
53.90070921985816%
Multi-Core
1043
28.820116054158607%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |