Buy on Amazon
£29.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 994 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - £29.99 vs £89.95
- Up to 58% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 5 3500X - £0.19 vs £0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 25% better in Rust than Celeron G3930 - 202 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
161
79%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Retail - (1151/Dual Core/2.90GHz/2MB/Kabylake/51W/Graphics) - BX80677G3930
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Buy for £89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 5 3500X
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
