Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G4900 - 169 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - £59.75 vs £64.99
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 54 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74057 minutes ago
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
54.60992907801418%
Multi-Core
1051
29.041171594363085%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |