Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 752 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 6% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - £59.75 vs £63.74
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 198 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G4900 - £0.32 vs £0.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£63.74
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £63.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |