Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2641 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i5-2400 - 146 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-2400 - £59.75 vs £74.99
- Up to 21% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-2400 - £0.41 vs £0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2481 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
145
99.31506849315068%
Value, £/FPS
£0.52/FPS
78.84615384615384%
Price, £
£74.99
79%
Buy for £74.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2481 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |