Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1345 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 3% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6350 - 62 vs 60 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 17% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - £49.99 vs £59.97
- Up to 14% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron G3930 - £0.83 vs £0.97 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |