Buy on Amazon
£49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 25% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - £49.99 vs £66.29
- Up to 22% better value when playing Stray than Celeron G6900 - £0.28 vs £0.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Stray than FX-6350 - 185 vs 176 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-6350 Black Edition CPU (AM3+, Hex Core, 3.90GHz, 14MB, 125W, Advanced Bit Manipulation)
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Intel® Celeron® G6900 Desktop Processor 4M Cache, up to 3.4 GHz
Buy for £66.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
