Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-7100 - 264 vs 251 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
77.79164067373674%
Multi-Core
2440
90.50445103857567%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |