Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 3500X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 833 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 3500X.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 5 3500X - 264 vs 262 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - £49.99 vs £89.95
- Up to 44% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 5 3500X - £0.19 vs £0.34 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
264
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Buy for £89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |