Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 620 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than Ryzen 3 3100 - 798 vs 784 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - £66.58 vs £73.69
- Up to 11% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen 3 3100 - £0.08 vs £0.09 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
798
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £66.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Buy for £73.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |