Buy on Amazon
£73.89
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 20% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4350 - 186 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - £59.97 vs £73.89
- Up to 3% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 3 3100 - £0.39 vs £0.4 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 Processor (4C/8T, 18 MB Cache, 3.9 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £73.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
